Google Meet vs Hangouts: Choosing the Right Video Conferencing Tool

Three monitors on a desk with a plant in the background, making it a perfect setup for video conferencing using Hangouts or Google Meet.
Share This Post
Table of Contents

Video conferencing tools have become indispensable in our daily communications, whether for personal conversations or professional meetings. Google offers two prominent services: Google Hangouts and Google Meet. Understanding the differences between these tools is essential to make an informed choice that best fits our communication needs.

v2 5ib2m r4pbv

Google Meet is designed with business users in mind, offering a suite of functions beneficial for professional gatherings, large-scale broadcasts, and secure conversations. Google Hangouts, on the other hand, serves casual video chats and integrates easily with other Google services for a seamless social experience. The evolution from Hangouts to Meet signifies Google’s commitment to providing a comprehensive and robust video conferencing solution that caters to the growing demands of a global, connected workforce.

Key Takeaways

  • Google Meet is aligned more with business and professional use, featuring expansive conference capabilities.
  • Hangouts offers ease for personal use with straightforward integration into Google’s social ecosystem.
  • A clear understanding of Google Meet and Hangouts helps in selecting the right platform for communication needs.

Google Meet and Hangouts Overview

In my exploration of Google’s communication services, I’ve observed that Google Meet and Hangouts cater to different user needs within the digital communication landscape.

Evolution from Hangouts to Meet

Google Hangouts started as a feature within Google+ and evolved into a standalone product designed to facilitate instant messaging and video calls. As the demands for online communication grew, especially for professional and educational purposes, Google introduced Google Meet, a more advanced and secure video conferencing solution that’s integrated with Google Workspace (formerly G Suite). Meet’s inception represented a strategic move to provide a service tailored for large-scale collaboration and to stay competitive in the market.

Core Purposes of Each Platform

  • Google Hangouts: This platform serves the casual communication needs well, suitable for friends and family looking to stay in touch. It supports text, voice, and video calls, accommodating up to 25 participants in a video meeting.

  • Google Meet: I’ve found Meet to be a robust tool designed for business and educational settings. It provides a secure environment for video conferences with support for larger groups, capable of hosting up to 100 participants (or more, depending on the plan). Meet also includes features such as screen-sharing and live presentations, which are essential for professional collaboration and remote teaching.

User Interface and Experience

v2 5ib52 y98v5

When examining Google Meet and Hangouts, I find the user interface (UI) and overall user experience pivotal for people preferring one service over the other. They both serve the core function of enabling video calls, yet they cater to different audiences through their design.

Ease of Use

Google Meet is designed with a business-oriented approach, focusing on simplicity and efficiency, enabling me to initiate and join meetings with minimal clicks. It integrates seamlessly into Google Calendar, enhancing my productivity. Navigating between different meeting features proves to be intuitive on both the web and mobile apps, which is essential as I often switch between iOS and Android devices.

Design Comparisons

The UI of Hangouts, on the other hand, appears less formal and more casual. It’s built with a straightforward design for instant messaging and video calls, but I notice it lacks some of the advanced features offered by Google Meet. However, the design of Hangouts enables me to quickly access chat and video without the added layers that Google Meet employs for more complex meeting setups. Both platforms have a distinct approach—one prioritizing feature-rich, structured meetings and the other simplicity and casual interactions.

Accessibility and Integration

v2 5ib69 jcreq

When discussing the accessibility and integration of Google Meet and Hangouts, it’s imperative to consider how these services align with various devices and the broader Google ecosystem. Each platform offers distinct advantages, enhancing my digital communication experience.

Device Compatibility

Google Meet impresses with its broad device compatibility, ensuring that I can join meetings from virtually any modern web browser or through dedicated mobile apps available on both iOS and Android platforms. Its adaptive design makes it easy for me to switch between devices, which is essential for staying connected on the go.

Hangouts, while now replaced by Meet for video conferencing, previously provided direct access through Gmail, also supporting diverse devices, which underscored its utility for casual conversations. However, as the focus has shifted towards Meet, device support for Hangouts has become a lesser concern.

Google Ecosystem Integration

My experience with Google Meet is seamlessly integrated within the Google Workspace ecosystem. For example, I can schedule events with Google Calendar invites that include Meet video links, manage my contacts effectively for meeting invites, and easily collaborate on files from Google Drive before or during a Meet session. This integration streamlines work processes and tightens collaboration.

Moreover, Google Chat and Google Docs are also part of this integration, allowing me to share documents during a Meet call directly and continue conversations in Google Chat afterwards. Switching between these tools is a smooth process that requires no additional logins, as they’re all tied to my single Google account. This cohesion across services is a standout feature that elevates the functionality of Meet within both professional and personal spheres.

Features and Functionality

v2 5ib7m rqf2n

In examining Google Meet and Hangouts, I focus on their core competencies in video conferencing, collaboration tools, and communication flexibility to clearly understand their distinctions and capabilities.

Video Conferencing Features

Google Meet provides robust video conferencing features, accommodating larger meetings and supporting live stream capabilities to broad audiences. Features like real-time captions and a low-light mode enhance accessibility and usability. Screen sharing options are particularly advanced in Google Meet, allowing me to share not just my entire screen but also individual tabs or windows, which is perfect for tailored presentations or when I wish to maintain privacy on my desktop.

Conversely, Hangouts is more suited for informal video chats or online meetings with a smaller set, facilitating up to 25 people. While it lacks advanced options such as a low-light mode or noise cancellation, it still offers fundamental screen sharing and instant messaging during calls.

Collaboration Tools

Google Meet shines when it comes to collaboration tools; it encrypts meetings for security and integrates smoothly with other Google productivity apps. This integration allows me to work on Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides alongside other participants, making it a stronger choice for team collaboration.

On the other hand, Hangouts provides a casual space with basic features for collaboration. It’s great for quick catch-ups or impromptu check-ins but doesn’t offer the same depth of integration for heavy-duty collaborative work.

Communication Flexibility

For communication flexibility, Google Meet accepts dial-in audio calls, enabling participants without internet access to join. With its advanced noise-cancellation technology, attendees can enjoy clearer audio—minimizing distractions from background noise. Meet also generates a unique meeting code for each session, increasing security and ease of access to the right meetings.

While Hangouts does not offer a dial-in option or specialized noise cancellation, it’s remarkably user-friendly for spontaneous video and audio calls, especially for personal use. My contacts can quickly reach me via Hangouts without needing a meeting code, promoting effortless instant messaging and video chat.

User Capacity and Limits

v2 5iba0 s52o9

In exploring the differences between Google Meet and Hangouts, it’s essential to understand their respective user capacity and limits imposed on meetings, which is a crucial consideration for businesses and individual users alike.

Meeting Participant Capacity

Google Meet elevates the user experience by allowing up to 250 participants in a single meeting for its Enterprise customers. This ensures that even large organizations can host substantial virtual gatherings without breaking stride. On the other side, Google Hangouts, which has evolved into Google Chat, had a cap of 10 participants for video calls for its classic version, subsequently raised to 25 for business users before its transition to Meet.

Business Solutions and Plans

For businesses, Google offers tiered solutions designed to cater to the needs of various organization sizes:

  • Business Starter: This plan facilitates more intimate meetings, ideal for smaller teams, supporting up to 100 participants.
  • Business Standard: A step up for growing companies, this plan expands capacity to 150 participants with the added benefit of recording meetings.
  • Business Plus: Designed for larger businesses, this plan supports up to 250 participants and provides additional features such as attendance tracking.

With these options, Google accommodates a wide array of business needs, from small local operations to large enterprise-level organizations, ensuring every meeting has the space it needs for participants.

Security and Privacy

v2 5ibb5 h015m

In my experience with video conferencing tools, I’ve learned that security and privacy concerns are paramount, especially considering instances like “zoombombing”. Google Meet and Hangouts differentiate themselves in various security protocols and features designed to protect meetings and user’s data.

Encryption and Data Protection

Google Meet provides robust end-to-end encryption for all its users; this means that the data shared during a meeting is encrypted from the sender’s device to the recipients’. Hangouts also maintains strong security measures, though historically it wasn’t always end-to-end encrypted. Today, I’m aware that communications in Hangouts are encrypted in transit, ensuring that information is protected against interception.

Meeting Safeguards

When comparing the meeting safeguards of Google Meet and Hangouts, I note that Google Meet offers more advanced protection against unauthorized access. Meeting hosts have the ability to control admissions to a meeting, reducing the risk of unwelcome participants and potential “zoombombing” incidents. Each meeting has a unique identifier, which makes unsolicited access by outsiders significantly more challenging. Conversely, Hangouts, intended for informal use, has traditionally been more open, missing some of the stringent safeguard features that Meet encompasses.

Performance and Reliability

v2 5ibc2 9lnsc

In discussing the performance and reliability of Google’s video conferencing tools, it’s essential to consider two critical aspects: how stable the internet connection remains during use, and the overall uptime of the platforms.

Internet Connection Stability

When I use Google Meet, my experience is that the platform handles fluctuations in internet stability better. I find that even on a weaker Wi-Fi signal, Meet maintains video quality without significant drops. In comparison, during a call on Hangouts, especially with multiple participants, the service sometimes struggles to keep the video feed stable without a strong internet connection.

Platform Uptime

For platform uptime, my observations align with Google’s reputation for reliability. Both services are generally reliable, but Google Meet boasts a slightly better record due to its integration with Google’s professional suite, where uptime is paramount. Although I rarely encounter downtime, it’s acknowledged in the industry that Meet’s purpose as a business tool necessitates a high degree of reliability.

Pricing and Plans

v2 5ibd0 9bhs5

When considering the use of Google’s communication tools, I am particularly mindful of the different pricing structures and what they offer. Google provides options tailored for both casual users and enterprise clients, ensuring flexibility based on individual needs.

Free vs. Paid Tiers

Google Chat and Google Meet both offer free plans, which include basic features sufficient for general use. Google Hangouts, on the other hand, is completely free and is a convenient option for consumers who want to stay connected through text and video calls without any cost. Nevertheless, paid options exist for those who require more advanced features. These are encompassed within the G Suite packages, which begin at a certain monthly fee and offer additional functionality.

Enterprise Solution Costs

For enterprise users, the cost depends on the level of functionality required. G Suite enterprise plans include access to Google Meet with extended features like larger meetings, recording options, and additional security measures. These plans have tiered pricing, ensuring that businesses can select an option that best fits their scale and budget. More details about the specific cost structure of these enterprise solutions can be found on Google Workspace’s pricing page.

Additional Services and Competitors

v2 5ibea ens6f

In comparing Google Meet and Hangouts, it’s essential to consider the broader market ecosystem, where similar services such as Zoom and Slack compete, while also addressing how these tools integrate with third-party apps to provide a seamless user experience.

Comparing Google Meet and Hangouts with Alternatives

When evaluating Google Meet and Hangouts against competitors, I focus on services like Zoom, which became widely popular during the coronavirus pandemic as an alternative to Zoom, known for its ease of use and robust features for large meetings. FaceTime, primarily used by Apple device users, offers video calling that’s tied into the Apple ecosystem. Meanwhile, WhatsApp provides a cross-platform messaging and video calling solution that’s widely used for personal communications.

Google Duo, Google’s video chatting app designed for smartphones, is another alternative increasingly used for casual one-on-one conversations. However, in a professional scenario, businesses occasionally lean towards services like Slack for integrating messaging and video calls, leveraging channels and direct messaging for team collaboration. Spaces, Google’s own collaboration tool integrated with Google Workspace, can complement video conferencing with project spaces for continued collaboration.

Interoperability with Third-Party Apps

My analysis incorporates how Google Meet and Hangouts can extend their capabilities via integration with apps like Zapier, allowing users to connect their video conferencing tools with over 2,000 other web services for automation. This interoperability improves workflows and productivity by automating tasks between apps, such as scheduling meetings or creating tasks from meeting notes.

With the shift toward remote work, the ability to integrate with a broad array of third-party applications has become increasingly important. Video conferencing tools that offer robust integrations, enable teams to streamline their operations, and remove the friction between various software solutions they rely on.

Google’s approach has been to create an interconnected suite of services, encouraging users to adopt their platforms for a comprehensive work environment. This strategy emphasizes convenience and aims to reduce the need for external applications. However, I recognize that businesses have differing needs, and hence the choice often depends on specific organizational requirements and preferences.

User Support and Resources

v2 5ibfy 85s49

I find that having access to robust user support and resources is crucial for any technology platform. For platforms like Google Meet and Hangouts, understanding these resources can significantly enhance the user experience by providing quick solutions and assistance when needed.

Guides and Documentation

Google Meet offers various official guides and documentation that are easily accessible and serve as a comprehensive resource for users. I can gain detailed insights on starting a meeting, scheduling via Google Calendar, screen sharing, and other functionalities directly from their platform. For Google Hangouts, although it has been phased out by Google, there are still resources available that were helpful for classic Hangouts users.

Community and Technical Support

Regarding community and technical support, Google has a strong community forum where I can discuss issues and solutions with other users. This platform is moderated by experts who provide knowledgeable input on a wide range of topics. The Google Workspace Admin Help is particularly helpful for troubleshooting and offers specialized support, especially now with the integration of Google Chat as part of the evolved Hangouts RCS (Rich Communication Services).

Future Developments and Updates

v2 5ibgn 5amgj

In the constantly evolving landscape of digital communication, Google’s commitment to enhancing Google Meet and phasing out Hangouts is reflected in their ambitious roadmap and responsive update cycle. I’ll now examine the specific future updates planned for these platforms.

Planned Features and Roadmap

Google Workspace has a clear direction for Google Meet, focusing on expanding its capabilities as a collaboration tool. Forthcoming updates are slated to integrate more deeply with other Google Workspace services, enhancing the overall workflow. One particular area of development is the integration of RCS (Rich Communication Services) to further enrich the messaging aspect of collaboration. Features like real-time document collaboration during calls and context-aware threads promise to streamline the meeting experience.

  • Enhanced Messaging: Integration of RCS for richer text interactions.
  • In-meeting Collaboration: Direct editing of Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides within a Meet call.
  • Smart Threads: Improved threading in discussions to streamline communication.

Adaptation to User Feedback

Google’s development cycle is responsive to user engagement and feedback, indicating a user-centric approach to updates. Significant enhancements to threads within Meet are a direct result of such feedback, aiming to make discussions more organized and searchable. Google has demonstrated a commitment to transforming Meet into a more powerful hub for collaboration by actively listening to its user base.

  • Custom Layouts: Tailoring meeting views based on user preferences.
  • Meeting Insights: Tools for summarizing topics and action items post-meeting.

Please note that detailed features and release timeframes are routinely updated in Google’s WorkSpace blog and official announcements.


v2 5ibic wju1t

In my comparison between Google Meet and Hangouts, I’ve found that both platforms serve distinct purposes tailored to different user needs. Google Meet stands out as a more robust solution for business and education users with features conducive to larger and more formal video conferencing needs. Specific window sharing and an optimized experience for video sharing, as highlighted by Zapier, make Meet particularly adept for professional collaborations.

On the other hand, Hangouts appears to be more suitable for casual conversations and has a limit of up to 25 people per video meeting. This positions it as an ideal choice for consumers looking to stay in touch with friends and family. PCMag emphasizes Hangouts as a free service that simplifies staying connected.

With its integration with other Google services, Meet facilitates a more seamless workflow within a professional ecosystem. It’s emphasized by the blog that although Hangouts came earlier, both services have developed their own set of valuable features that cater to different audiences.

Finally, Google Chat’s emergence as a replacement for Hangouts in instant messaging and for collaboration within Google Workspace illustrates a further differentiation in purpose between the communication tools available through Google.

Each platform has its strengths, and understanding these can help users choose the service that best fits their communication style and needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

v2 5ibjf fs3go

In addressing the most common inquiries, I’ll cover not only the distinctions and features of Google Meet and Google Hangouts but also their evolution, costs, and the strategic direction of Google’s communication tools.

What is the difference between Google Meet and Google Hangouts?

Google Meet and Google Hangouts differ mainly in their target audiences and feature sets. Google Meet is designed for business and organizational use, offering robust features like larger meeting sizes and live streaming capabilities, as seen in the Zapier comparison of Google Meet vs. Hangouts. Hangouts, on the other hand, was initially for casual users with simpler video calling and chat options.

Is there a cost associated with using Google Meet?

Google made Meet available for free to all users with a Google account, but there are also premium features available through Google Workspace subscriptions. The details on costs can depend on the specific plan and features required, which are explained in an article by PCMag.

How has Google Hangouts evolved into the current Google communication tools?

Google Hangouts has transitioned into two separate products: Google Meet for video conferencing and Google Chat for instant messaging. This change reflects Google’s effort to streamline and specialize their communication services for different user needs, as documented by HelpWire.

What are the main features of Google Meet and how is it typically used?

Google Meet is used for secure, high-quality video meetings that can support many participants simultaneously. Notable features include screen sharing, in-meeting chat, and real-time captions. It is typically employed for business meetings, webinars, and online classes. More on these features can be found on articles like the one from CNET.

Between Google Chat and Google Meet, which service is better for online collaboration?

For instant messaging, document sharing, and continuous team collaboration, Google Chat is preferred. For video conferencing or group presentations where visual engagement is key, Google Meet is the better option. The use case determines which service is more suitable, as each has its own strengths for online collaboration.

Why is Google transitioning away from Hangouts and what are the alternatives?

Google is transitioning from Hangouts to focus on services that better serve modern communication demands, like Google Meet and Google Chat. These tools are part of Google’s strategy to provide more specialized, integrated communication solutions. Alternatives include services within the Google ecosystem and third-party communication apps. Transition details can be found in various publications, including this description on

More To Explore